2 | WHAT IS KETOSIS
The hormone insulin activates key enzymes in metabolic pathways which store energy derived from carbohydrates.When an absence or scarcity of dietary carbohydrates occurs, a subsequent reduction in insulin levels lead to a reduction in lipogenesis (the metabolic formation of fat), and fat accumulation.After a few days of drastically reduced carbohydrate consumption (below 50 grams/day), glucose reserves become insufficient for fat oxidation and are therefore unable to supply glucose to the central nervous system. However, the central nervous system cannot utilize fat for energy, and after 3–4 days without carbohydrate consumption, the central nervous system is ‘forced’ to find an alternative energy source, leading to the increased production of ketone bodies acetoacetate, β-hydroxybutyric acid and acetone in a process called ketogenesis, occurring principally in the mitochondrial matrix of the liver.
Ketogenesis occurs during periods ofprolonged fasting, in type 1 diabetes, and in individuals following high-fat/low-carbohydrate diets.The main ketone body produced in the liver is acetoacetate, but the primary circulating ketone is β-hydroxybutyrate.Under conditions of adequate dietary carbohydrate intake, free acetoacetic acid is typically low, and rapidly metabolized by various tissues such as the skeletal and heart muscles. However, in conditions where acetoacetic acid is overproduced, it is converted to the other two ketone bodies leading to the presence of ketone bodies in the blood and urine that act as an alternative metabolic substrate to glucose, supplying energy to the central nervous system.
KETOSIS VS. KETOACIDOSIS
It is important to note that ketosis is a completely different physiological mechanism than it’s similar-sounding pathological counterpart ketoacidosis, which is seen in individuals with type 1 diabetes. In physiological ketosis which occurs during very-low-calorie or low carbohydrate ketogenic diets, ketone concentrations reach maximum levels of 7/8 mmol/l and do not go higher because the central nervous system must use these molecules for energy in place of glucose. Subsequently, there is no change in pH. However, in uncontrolled diabetic ketoacidosis, ketone concentrations can exceed 20 mmol/l while lowering the blood pH which can be very dangerous.
HISTORY OF THE KETOGENIC DIET
In biblical times and in the times of Hippocrates, the Greek ‘father of medicine’,fasting was used as a means to treat epilepsy, but remained poorly understood for millennia.Before the understanding of the mechanisms of fasting, physicians also used starvation clinically to treat epilepsy. The following is a brief history of how food deprivation as a treatment for epilepsy unfolded in the 1920s into the use of the ketogenic diet for epilepsy as we know it today.
Dr. Guelpa and Dr. Marie: French physicians who authored the first scientific report on the value of fasting in epilepsy in 1911. Marie and Guelpa described a cyclical fasting regimen of four days of fasting and purging, followed by four days of a restricted vegetarian diet. [1].
Bernarr Macfadden: A physical fitness guru/cultist who believed that any disease could be cured through exercise and fasting. This included asthma, diabetes, prostate cancer, impotence, paralysis, liver and kidney disease, as well as epilepsy [3].
Dr. Hugh W. Conklin: An American osteopathic physician and assistant to Macfadden who adopted Macfadden’s beliefs and methods of fasting to treat his patients with epilepsy. His impressive and positive results drew attention from other pioneers [4, 5].
H. Rawle Geyelin: An American endocrinologist who was the first to report his use of fasting as a treatment for bromide and phenobarbital-resistant epilepsy to the American Medical Association (AMA) in 1919 [6]. Geyelin was most interested in discovering the mechanisms that made fasting such an effective treatment for epilepsy [7].
Dr. A. Goldbloom: A Canadian physician (and skeptic of Dr. Conklin) who treated patients with fasting, but noticed that when the fasting period ended, the seizures returned for some.He wrote, “It would seem from this case that the starvation treatment is effective only while it is continued and while the patient remains in bed, but that it has no enduring qualities [8]. “
HTH: A boy who had grand mal seizures that were treated with fasting who was initially presented to the AMA convention by Dr. Geyelin. HTH was placed on a “Water Diet” fast for 3-4 weeks to treat his epileptic seizures. During the fasting period, his seizures disappeared. However, his seizures returned after the conclusion of the fast as Dr. Goldbloom suggested they might. Luckily for the boy and for the rest of the world with epilepsy, HTH was the nephew of pediatric physician Dr. John Howland, and son of a very wealthy Charles Howland [9, 10].
Dr. John Howland: Professor of pediatrics at Johns Hopkins, and director of the Harriet Lane Home for Invalid Children. In 1915, his brother Charles Howland donated five thousand dollars (the equivalent of more than $120,000 today)to support research on the mechanisms of fasting in the treatment of epilepsy due to worries of his son HTH’s intractable seizures that were not cured with starvation by Dr. Conklin [ 11,12 ].
Dr. Stanley Cobb and W.G. Lennox: Dr. Stanley Cobb was an associate professor of neuropathy at Harvard and physician who was in the audience during the presentation given by Geyelin to AMA. He and his colleague Lennox were enlisted by the parents of HTH and Dr. John Howland in to further study the mechanisms of fasting on epilepsy [9]. Cobb and Lennox conducted several studies on fasting and had reported several significant findings, noting that levels of the ketone bodies β-hydroxybutyrate, acetoacetate, and acetone are elevated in the peripheral blood and in the urine [10].
R.T. Woodyatt: Diabetes Researcher in 1921, around the time of the studies of Cobb and Lennox, authored a review article about dietary manipulations for diabetes stating that acetone, acetic acid, and beta-hydroxybutyric acid (BHB) appears in subjects via fasting, or via a diet containing too low a proportion of carbohydrate and a high proportion of fat [13]
Dr. Wilder: Physician from the Mayo Clinic who originally coined the term “Ketogenic diet.” [17] Based on the work by Woodyatt and Geyelin, Wilder proposed that the benefits of fasting could be obtained if ketone bodies had been produced by other means, such as eating a diet that was rich in fat and low in carbohydrate [14].
Wilder was the first to suggest that the ketogenic diet may be as effective as fasting, and could be maintained for an extended period to compensate for the disadvantages of prolonged fasting periods. The following day in 1921 after his proposal, a report was issued describing the success in seizure control of three patients of the Mayo Clinic using a ketogenic diet as a treatment instead of fasting.
In 1924, The Mayo Clinic began treating adults with epilepsy with the revolutionary “ketogenic diet.” [15–17].
3 | TERMINOLOGY
KD – Classic Ketogenic Diet
MAD – Modified Atkins Diet
MCT – Medium-Chain Triglycerides
MCTD – Medium-Chain Triglyceride Diet
LDL – Low-Density Lipoprotein
HDL – High-Density Lipoprotein
RCT– Randomized Controlled Trials
CICO– Calories-In Calories-Out theory
PUFA– Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
DHA– Docosahexaenoic Acid
4 | KETOGENIC DIET RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS (RCTs)
While some studies may detect associations between an intervention and an outcome, it can be difficult to rule out the possibility that the association was caused by another unknown factor. However, the randomization that occurs in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) reduces the possibility of systematic errors, and are the most rigorous way of determining whether a cause-effect relation exists between treatment and outcome, and the extent to which specific, planned impacts are being achieved. RCTs are quantitative, comparative, controlled experiments in which a group of investigators study two or more interventions in a series of participants who are allocated randomly to each intervention group with several important features, such as:
• Random allocation to intervention groups.
• Neither the patients nor the trial conductors are aware of which treatment was given to which patients until the study has completed.
• Intervention groups are treated identically except for the experimental treatment.
• Patients are analyzed within the group that they were allocated, whether they experienced the intended result or not.
• The analysis of the results focuses on estimating the effect size between different groups.
While many published studies have investigated the ketogenic diet RCTs are the most stringent way of determining whether a cause-effect relation exists between the intervention and the outcomeFor this reason, this research review will focus on the outcomes of these types of studies.
TYPE II DIABETES KETO RCTs
In 2017, the CDC reported that more than 100 million Americans, or 1/3 of the US population had pre-diabetes or diabetes, and was the leading cause of death in 2015.Worldwide, diabetes affects more than 422 million people and is the leading cause of blindness, kidney failure, heart disease, and stroke. Clearly, diabetes is a serious health problem, but it can often be managed through physical activity, diet, and medication [18]. The findings of the reviewed studies suggest that the ketogenic diet may improve symptoms of Type II Diabetes.
Study: “An Online Intervention Comparing a Very Low-Carbohydrate Ketogenic Diet and Lifestyle Recommendations Versus a Plate Method Diet in Overweight Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Findings: Individuals with type II Diabetes improved glycemic control and lost significantly more weight after they had been randomized to a very low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet and lifestyle program compared to a conventional low-fat diabetes diet program [19].
Study: “Short-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of a very low-calorie-ketogenic diet interventional weight loss program versus hypo-caloric diet in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.“
Findings: The very low-calorie ketogenic diet intervention was the most effective in reducing body weight and improvement in glycemic control compared to a standard hypo-caloric diet and was well tolerated in Type II Diabetes patients [20].
WEIGHT LOSS
The first law of thermodynamics— also known as the law of conservation of energy— has in effect controlled the concepts and conventional wisdom of weight loss (colloquially known as the Calories-In Calories-Out theory (CICO) for over a century— resulting in a notable difficulty in accepting other potential ways of thinking.
Also adhering to conventional wisdom regarding weight loss and caloric deficit concepts, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA)has concluded that reducing calories alone results in weight loss, and that weight loss is independent of the macronutrient composition of the diet. Many educated following USDA guidelines also maintain the belief that the macronutrient composition of one’s diet is irrelevant to weight loss, provided that the calories remain in a deficit to caloric expenditure.
However, in sharp contrast with these views, the majority of ad-libitum studies demonstrate that subjects who follow a low-carbohydrate diet lose more weight during the first 3–6 months compared with those who follow more macronutrient-balanced diets.
While the exact metabolic mechanisms are not yet fully understood, some researchers suggest that macro-nutrient manipulations increase satiety and therefore reduces caloric intake, while others suggest that a distinct metabolic advantage is occurring.
Nevertheless, the outcomes of the following studies should raise further interest in the exploration of the ketogenic diet and its weight loss potential.
Study: “Obesity treatment by very low-calorie-ketogenic diet at two years: reduction in visceral fat and on the burden of disease.”
Findings: Of those who completed the study, the analysis revealed that from the beginning (15 days) until the end of the observation, the weight reduction observed in the very-low-calorie-ketogenic diet was double that of the low-calorie diet [21].
Study: “Comparison of a very low-calorie-ketogenic diet with a standard low-calorie diet in the treatment of obesity.”
Findings: In a group of obese patients, the VLCK diet was significantly more effective than a standard low-calorie diet. At one year follow-up in the group with a VLCK diet, most of the patients lost more than 10% of their initial weight. However, lean mass was well preserved [22].
Study: “Very-low-calorie ketogenic diet with amino acid supplement versus very low restricted-calorie diet for preserving muscle mass during weight loss: a pilot double-blind study.
Findings: The pilot study found that a VLCKD was highly effective in terms of body weight reduction without inducing lean body mass loss, thus preventing the risk of sarcopenia. Further, the results show that a low-carbohydrate diet, associated with a decreased caloric intake, is effective in weight loss [23].
Study: “Effect of DHA supplementation in a very low-calorie ketogenic diet in the treatment of obesity: a randomized clinical trial.”
Background: An increased ratio of dietary omega-6 : omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) has been linked to the risk of chronic inflammatory diseases. Studies have identified docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) as a precursor to a potent anti-inflammatory eicosanoids, known as resolvins and protectins, which actively help terminate an inflammatory response.
Findings:Using a controlled, open design clinical trial, the patients of this study were randomized to receive either a very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCK)or an isocaloric VLCK diet without DHA (control group). The main finding of this study was that the very low-calorie ketogenic diet supplemented with DHA group improved inflammation-resolving eicosanoids compared with the isocaloric VLCK diet group, and was effective in inducing loss of body weight [24].
Study: “Metabolic impact of a ketogenic diet compared to a hypo-caloric diet in obese children and adolescents.”
Findings: Children and adolescents on the hypo-caloric diet were instructed to reduce their caloric intake by 500 calories daily while deriving 28%–33% and 50%–55% of these calories from fat and carbohydrates, respectively.
Both groups had significant reductions in weight and fat mass, however, the ketogenic group had more pronounced improvements in weight loss and metabolic parameters than the hypocaloric diet.The authors conclude that the ketogenic may be a feasible and safe weight loss intervention for children [25].
Study:“Effects of a very-low-calorie diet on body composition, metabolic state, and genes expression: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.”
Findings: This is the first study that analyzed body composition, metabolic profile, inflammation, and expression of oxidative stress genes after the admin-istration of a very low carbohydrate ketogenic diet (VLCKD). Results of the study show the efficacy of a VLCKD with synthetic protein replacement for the reduction of cardiovascular risk, without the development of sarcopenia, or the activation of inflammatory and oxidative processes [26].